Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esma Salemé

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:05, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Esma Salemé

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Lacks independent coverage about her in reliable sources. Spam bombarded with PR sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:00, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per WP:GNG. Sources provided are not reliable, additional sources searched for came up unreliable as well. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 03:04, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What about eTalk coverage, Exposed Vocals, HipHopCanada and Honey Jam? Her albums are even on iTunes. You guy can proceed and do whatever you think is right for Wikipedia, but really all the efforts that I poured into this would be gone by then trying to add something into Wikipedia. Khaled Abolaynain (talk) 12:08, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comatmebro, can I at least get a reaction of my reasoning? Khaled Abolaynain (talk) 12:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Having your work sold on iTunes and having coverage in something called etalk are not signs of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:11, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I rephrased some parts of the article, added more reliable links from The Vancouver Sun, Metro News, CityTV and Canadian Musician. Maybe you can check those and tell me what you think. Khaled Abolaynain (talk) 19:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet the inclusion criteria for entertainers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:10, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete 2 local news pieces, CityTV and the Vancouver Sun, are a start but jsut show that the person is of some mild regional interest only. TheValeyard (talk) 22:32, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per above.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:31, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.